A Case for Sarah Palin

BLM:90 WHM:90 SMN:90 THF:90 WAR:90 DRK:90 RNG:90 PLD:90


First of all, I would do her. You would, your pa and maybe even your ma and if she licked a lolipop on TV, I would literally drop my jaw.

Now why would we put this woman in DC. I don't know why people call DC Washington since there is also a state with this name so why not just say DC? Boggles the mind.

So if you're a good lawyer you think to yourself after watching GAME CHANGE omg what a bad choice. But watch it like 7 times like I did and you get a feel for the person that she was and the popularity she enjoyed and if you rank yourself as a supreme critical thinker like I do, then, how do you sell her assets as a leader?

Ok, we know that she made a flip flop on a bridge to nowhere. We know that she started off the campaign adoring John McCain and later working against him. We know that her advisors were part of the problem but somehow justified themselves by making her the source even though there is only one of her. WE KNOW she was apart from her husband. We know her knowledge of politics was limited to her dealings with people of a small town who grew up knowing her.

Ok, how to fix this? Give Katie Couric an enema, maybe. Ask everyone on YOUR side if those were fair questions. Then get them to agree that they weren't.

Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE who was elected leader of anything is someone worthy of praise and to sell them to a larger populace you have to focus on their assets and understand that they concomittantly have similar shortfalls to balance them out.

If Ronald Reagan made a good president, then mant people can replace Gen. Petreaus. There are just SO many good choices. This is why CEOs are said to deserve their great salaries because they have such "special" powers as to be irreplaceable. But what is it they have?

Do they have really good connections that other people don't have? So a "gentleman's agreement" is a good thing?

Do they know so much about economics and business that others would be confused by what they were "forced" to understand? So does IS-LM ring a bell?

Do they deserve to have their jobs because they have the most ambition? Are people with uncommon ambition hard to find? Are they hard to find in jail?

So as I have said before these people need to be replaced as often as possible without causing disruption that impedes the business.

Time out for a minute. I am watching Up with Chris Hayes and they are discussing Bradley Manning. Now you are going to maybe come down on me for this but we all agree that working against our military is a bad thing. Fine.

There is a reason for arrests. It is to stop bad behavior. There is no reason for solitary, no reason for police to hurry you along while in captivity, no reason for ired looks or provocative behavior. Your job at the jail is to watch people that have been "stopped". As far as I'm concerned they should all be fitted with plastic mitts and heavy shoes and just be left to do whatever they want in a yard until they get tired and have to go to sleep. If they get destructive verbally, they get a iron mask so people can tell who like to attack people. And always two people should get these. Some people are so sensitive that a simple things set them off so no matter what, TWO people must pay or as I used to say in the bar... "both must go".

Now this an easy concept for you to understand so pay attention... you can't fault someone for not keeping a secret.

A secret in itself is a selfish act. It works against public welfare. Now if you endanger someone, a spy, a soldier, an ambassador's personal views... this is something to be quantified. Leaking information is an act so motives for this have to be recorded and then collateral damage can be rendered. It came out in the show that Bradly Manning found proof that the military was working with the enemy, that an Apache helicopter attack killed civilians and also he found himself the object of ridicule for being gay.

Can you blame him? I mean can you blame him ahead of time... before you hear what he has to say? If you can, you are guilty of prejudice. You are a black man with a black friend sitting on a bail of cotton. King of the hill.

So I would NOT be a slave, so... I WILL NOT BE A MASTER!

Words to live by... said by Lincoln.

Ok sidetracked, so if you are defending Palin, wow I'm tired what was I saying? Heh, remember Counselor Troi in First Contact? No I am not drinking atm.

So to defend Sarah Palin, you have to look at her attributes. She is a mom. She hunts Moose. She has experience working with small town people. Small town people are much more trusting than city folks, so sell that. People in Chicago KNOW that if you leave your lighter on the table, people would be stupid not to take it. That's the city. People will say that it's not true but those people are being PC and know differently. People in the country don't take people's lighters and they all have guns and they all leave their doors open. It's a mentality. People are so trusting that OF COURSE the gun is for animals, of course people wouldn't steal your car, of course people want to use your lighter and will then put it back.

That is the essence of being a small town Governor. Something they didn't sell in the movie. The proof of her ability was that she had FIVE children. By mother's standards she is a QUEEN.

She has mistakes through no fault of her own. A child pregnant, a son in the war, another child disabled. Her list is long on proof that she had been through trials and that she can handle herself. Her failure, as seen in the movie, can be used to show that to everyone, what she must not do and what she wouldn't. Is she capable of running and winning, YES.

Would she flip flop on stuff as much as Romney? By now it should be obvious to everyone that Romney dumped but alas... who will ever know.

Sarah Palin is the best example we have of a woman that could be king. Now I realize that women should be Democrats but why not? Why not have a gritty country girl Shania Twain-like boot kicker woman show us how she keeps her husband handled, her children handled, her peers handled and then ALL OF US handled. And if she does it with charm, like she should, she might just be able to handle the whole world.

And that w9uld make her Jezebel. heh but no seriously, that would make us all the more pleasant to negotiate with and would give the world that much more trust in our process.

Sarah... just be true to yourself.